Monday, August 24, 2009

Frankenstein (2004 - Hallmark Miniseries) - Kevin Connor

Frankenstein (2004 - Hallmark Miniseries)
Director: Kevin Connor
Writers: Mary Shelley (Novel), Mark Kruger (Teleplay)
Starring: Luke Goss, Alec Newman, Julie Delpy, Nicole Lewis, Monika Hilmerová, Donald Sutherland, William Hurt

Over the past couple months I have watched a whole lot of Frankenstein films. The Frankenstein Hallmark Miniseries (2004) is the last one on my list for my Frankenstein blog-a-thon and is probably the one to most closely follows the story told in Mary Shelley's novel. It seems that great care was taken to adapt the novel as faithfully as possible. However, as we've learned with most Frankenstein movies before this, following the story from the book does not always make the best movie.

This is definitely not a bad version of the story but honestly it isn't anything special either. The acting, directing, set design and writing are all passable but there isn't anything that makes them stand out above any other Frankenstein film. I enjoyed it while I was watching it but I really have no desire to ever revisit the film.

While the film isn't really bad, the one thing that kind of makes it hard to enjoy is the long running time. This was originally aired as a television miniseries and after awhile it just starts to get kind of dull. Towards the end of the film I found that even though most of the acting and the story were passable, they were only passable for so long. There wasn't really enough here to carry a movie of over 200 minutes.

There isn't really a whole lot to complain about in the film but there also isn't really much to praise either. It is one of the films that sits right in the middle; It isn't bad, it isn't good... it just is. Because of that this is probably going to be a pretty short review. I will say that for a TV movie it handles most things better the 1992 version starring Randy Quaid. However Randy Quaid made a much better monster than Luke Goss.

While I found the acting from Luke Goss to be just fine in the film I didn't much care of this portrayal of the creature. I understand that in this version of the film they were trying show that the creature is not really a monster but is gentle and kind. I think they went to far with this though. One of the problems was that they didn't make the creature at all monstrous looking. This is a problem when people are supposed to be shunning the creature because of how different and ugly he looks. The creature just looks far too normal for it to be believable when people start running away from him for no other reason than his appearance.

"Oh no! Run a away! Its a tall guy with blotchy skin and long hair!"

The creature also seems to become articulate must faster in this version of the story than in any other. His transition from a creature with no idea of who he is or where he came from to an intelligent creature isn't really fleshed out enough in my opinion. This is kind of disappointing because of how long the film is. It seems they could have taken a lot more time to flesh out this part of the story.

When it comes down it this is a okay version of the story but there isn't really much to it. I am not sorry I sat down to watch it but I don't see myself ever sitting down to watch it again. In the end most of the film is just rather forgettable and that could probably be one of the other reasons that this review is running so short. If the movie just isn't that memorable it is going to be hard to find any to really write about.

Rating: 5/10

9 comments:

  1. You missed the Dean Koontz version.

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0397430/

    ReplyDelete
  3. That version was actually on my list of maybes when I was deciding which versions to watch. I may watch it eventually but right now I am kind of burnt out on Frankenstein. The fact that Parker Posey is in it does kind of make me want to see it though. She is one of my celebrity crushes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. However... it was directed by Marcus Nispel and I couldn't stand his take on Friday the 13th or The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. I still might give it a chance sometime. There are a few other versions that I need to see as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Did you review "The Bride"? It's one of my favorite revisionist FRANKENSTEIN movies, although it's more of a remake of THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN than the actual FRANKENSTEIN story.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nope, "The Bride" is another one that I didn't get a chance to see yet. It is on my list to watch eventually though.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Frankenstein's monster, good.
    Society, bad.

    POTA (original) super good and most iconoclastic.

    Moi's CTNOTT super duper iconoclastic.

    Stay on groovin' safari,
    Tor

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like this film (-_-)
    Luke Goss is a lovely monster : )

    ReplyDelete
  9. In my opinion I believe that Frankenstein (The Creature) is not a monster at all. First of all when Mary Shelly first rote the book she point it out info on the creature was actualy the first zombie in history. Because the keynotes in the book point out that Victor used dead body parts,and stitched them together into a human torso, and the features of this new human being is a zombie. Second, the behaviors of The Creature and compare it to the behaviors of a zombie. #1 Zombies can decay over time, but the Creature don't. #2 Zombies are cannibals, but the Creature eats berries, nuts, and sometimes wild animals. #3 Both zombies and the Creature are pyrophobic (afraid of fire). #4 Both zombies and the Creature can reanimate.

    ReplyDelete


Related Posts with Thumbnails